We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 18 October 16
COAL PRICES KEPT CLIMBING
COALspot.com: A rally in thermal coal prices over the past few months, after years of decline, is still continuing and it is expected to rally at l ...
Tuesday, 18 October 16
PANAMAX: A FAIRLY POSITIVE END TO THE WEEK - ALLIED
Capesize
Things seemed to be moving sideways during the first half of the week, with resistance being felt as owners tried to resist any further ...
Monday, 17 October 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS SOFTENED IN ALL SEGMENTS THIS PAST WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities decline slightly and ending in a negative note this past ...
Friday, 14 October 16
SUPRAMAXES: DELIVERY SINGAPORE ARE SETTLING AROUND HIGH 6K'S FOR COAL TRIPS TO CHINA VIA INDO - FEARNLEY
Supramax
Wait and see attitude prevailing all over the market.
There have been several fresh cargoes, which have been efficiently covered by ...
Friday, 14 October 16
U.S. SHIPPED 3.3 MMST COAL IN JULY 2016; DECLINE 40% M/M
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.6 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 2251 to 2255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|