We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 October 16
MARKET INSIGHT - LINOS KOGEVINAS
Another Monday has gone by, bringing with it further turbulence for oil. A series of meetings between high-production nations Russia & Saudi Ar ...
Wednesday, 12 October 16
INDIAN STEELMAKERS' DELEVERAGING AT RISK ON COKING COAL PRICE JUMP - FITCH
The sharp increase in coking coal prices since August 2016 could squeeze Indian steelmakers' profitability and threaten their deleveraging, Fit ...
Wednesday, 12 October 16
UK SEABORNE COAL IMPORT PLUNGES 64% AS A WORRYING TREND LURKS - BIMCO
The main exporters of thermal coal for coal- fired power plants to the United Kingdom (UK) have experienced a heavy decline in seaborne cargo volum ...
Monday, 10 October 16
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE HITS HIGHEST LEVELS SINCE SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price hits to its highest level since September 2014. The government declared benchmark prices for Indon ...
Monday, 10 October 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET FIRMS UP ON STRONG CAPE PERFORMANCE
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose again and ending in a positive note this past week. ...
|
|
|
Showing 2256 to 2260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
|
| |
| |
|
