We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 27 October 16
PANAMAX: FIRM ATLANTIC; TOPPISH PACIFIC - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The trend from last week is passed on. ECSA still strong with Supras from N Brazil to Med fixed at $9,000 to $9,500 daily.
Accordin ...
Wednesday, 26 October 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
If the finale of a thriller movie finds the leading actor successfully surviving after all the sacrifices he has made, the audience presumes this t ...
Tuesday, 25 October 16
INDONESIAN COAL PRICES MARCH HIGHER CONTINUES
COALspot.com: A rally in thermal coal prices over the past few months, after years of decline, is still continuing and it is expected to rally at l ...
Tuesday, 25 October 16
THINGS ARE SLOWLY STARTING TO IMPROVE AS CORRECTIONS ARE MADE - ALLIED
It seems as though left, right and centre, all we see nowadays is the word “restructuring”.
There is restructuring amongst bankers ...
Monday, 24 October 16
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 0.78 MILLION TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender for 780,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous Coal for its B ...
|
|
|
Showing 2241 to 2245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
