We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 03 November 16
THE INDEX BASED COAL SALES & PURCHASE STRATEGY MAKES MORE EFFICIENT, SAYS 55.17% END-USERS
Considering the current coal market condition, the Index based coal sales & purchase strategy make more efficient was deemed the winner by 57.0 ...
Thursday, 03 November 16
CAPESIZE: BRAZIL/CHINA RATES MOVED TO THE $11 PMT LEVEL; WEST AUSTRALIA/CHINA ROUTE MOVED UP CLOSE TO MID $5 PMT LEVEL - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
In the Atlantic we see a bit more activity than in the eastern hemisphere, says Fearnleys in its latest weekly report. Fhauls via Black ...
Wednesday, 02 November 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT
A week before the U.S. presidential election, everyone is eager to see the socio-political effects that the result of these elections will have. As ...
Wednesday, 02 November 16
SHIP OPERATING COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO RISE IN BOTH 2016 AND 2017 - MOORE STEPHENS
Vessel operating costs are expected to rise in both 2016 and 2017. Repairs and maintenance and spares are the cost categories which are likely to i ...
Tuesday, 01 November 16
PANAMAX : A FAIR AMOUNT OF SIDEWAYS SHIPPING IN RATES - ALLIED SHIPPING
Capesize
A very sluggish start to the week, with rates dropping considerably as all optimism seems to have evaporated over the weekend. According ...
|
|
|
Showing 2231 to 2235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Deloitte Consulting - India
|
| |
| |
|
