We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 November 16
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE ROSE 59.57 PER CENT YEAR TO MONTH
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price hits to its highest level since May 2013. The government declared benchmark prices for Indo ...
Monday, 07 November 16
HANDYSIZE: THE ASIAN INDICES RECORDED A GRADUAL DROP EVERY DAY - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A rumour-fuelled market this week but essentially rates a touch firmer and owners cautiously optimistic. The flotilla of vessels heading ...
Monday, 07 November 16
THE SUPRAMAX CHARTER RATES FOR INDONESIA TO INDIA WERE RATING AT AROUND $7500-8000 A DAY
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose slightly and ending in a positive note this past wee ...
Friday, 04 November 16
U.S COAL PRODUCTION UP WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 17 million short tons ...
Friday, 04 November 16
INDONESIAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ARE UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED
Press Release: October 20-21, 2016 Indonesia Infrastructure Summit (IIC) opened at the Hyatt Hotel in Jakarta The theme of the meeting was "Pr ...
|
|
|
Showing 2226 to 2230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
