We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 10 November 16
WILL TRUMP VICTORY PROVIDE A BOOST FOR HYDROCARBON & COAL INDUSTRIES? - DOUGLAS-WESTWOOD
Donald Trump’s surprise victory ends months of an adversarial presidential campaign with bitter disagreements between the two major candidate ...
Thursday, 10 November 16
PANAMAX: NO TRUMP INFLUENCE YET, AND THE MARKET IS HEADING NORTH - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Pacific Supra market still soft and falling this week, although seems to be in a somewhat slower pace compared to last week. According t ...
Wednesday, 09 November 16
SINGAPORE'S SGX COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF LONDON'S BALTIC EXCHANGE
COALspot.com: Singapore Exchange Limited and The Baltic Exchange Limited together announced that the acquisition of the Baltic Exchange by SGX has ...
Wednesday, 09 November 16
SUPRAMAX: 50% INCREASE ON AVERAGE SINCE THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE YEAR - GIANNIS ANDRITSOPOULOS
Last week was an interesting one for the tanker market, which following the explosion of the gas pipeline in Alabama witnessed a spike in Atlantic ...
Tuesday, 08 November 16
S.KOREA'S KOMIPO ISSUES TENDER TO BUY 390K TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL FOR JAN-FEB 2017
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender for 390,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous Coal for its B ...
|
|
|
Showing 2221 to 2225 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
