We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 10 January 17
SHIPPING MARKET 2017
After having entered into a New Year, fresh hopes seem to be high for this to be the turning point in the market that many have been looking forwar ...
Monday, 09 January 17
FFA SUPRAMAX: Q1 AND Q2 TRADING UP TO $7100 WHILE CAL17 PRINTED $7250 - FIS
Capesize
Sentiment has swung quickly on capes and although there appears to be a very short list for open tonnage in the Atlantic Feb dates appea ...
Monday, 09 January 17
COAL MARKETS WERE UNEXPECTEDLY ONE OF THE STRONGEST PERFORMERS OF 2016 - SGX
COALspot.com: Coal markets were unexpectedly one of the strongest performers of 2016, with domestic production restrictions in China as well as sup ...
Monday, 09 January 17
THE INDONESIA COAL BENCHMARK PRICE SLIDES AFTER THE RECENT RALLY
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price slides in January 2017 after the recent rally. The government declared benchmark prices for Indone ...
Friday, 06 January 17
U.S. WEEKLY ESTIMATED COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED APPROXIMATELY 12.4 MMST; DOWN 18.4% W/W - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 12.4 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 2156 to 2160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
