We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 23 January 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET DID NOT CHANGE MUCH AND WAS ALMOST AT SAME LEVELS AS LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market did not change much and was almost at same levels as last week.
The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships ...
Friday, 20 January 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT ESTIMATED 15.7 MMST; UP 14.1% W/W
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.7 million short ton ...
Thursday, 19 January 17
KOREAN POWER UTILITY BORYEONG POWER TO IMPORT 660K TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL FOR MARCH 2017
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender for 590,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous coal and 7000 ...
Thursday, 19 January 17
PANAMAX RATES ARE UNDER PRESSURE IN BOTH HEMISPHERES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The market remained flat and the week continued at the same pace as last.
According to Fearnleys weekly dry bulk report, still more ...
Wednesday, 18 January 17
TANKER: THE CLEAN PRODUCT MARKET IS STILL NOT GIVING US ANY CLEAR SIGNS OF RECOVERY - GEORGE VASTARDIS
While we are approaching the Chinese New Year, the Clean Product market is still not giving us any clear signs of recovery, especially on The East ...
|
|
|
Showing 2146 to 2150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
