We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 16 January 17
WHY THE SOLUTION TO INDIA'S ENERGY CHALLENGE LIES IN COAL POWER PLANTS - BENJAMIN SPORTON
India’s huge development and energy challenges mean there are economic and development arguments for investing in new coal power plants for t ...
Friday, 13 January 17
U.S. COAL PRICES TO INCREASE IN 2017 AND IN 2018 - EIA
Coal Supply
EIA estimates that U.S. coal production declined by 158 million short tons (MMst) (18%) in 2016, to 739 MMst, which would be the lowe ...
Friday, 13 January 17
U.S. COAL IMPORTS IN THIRD QUARTER 2016 TOTALED 2.7 MMST, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 13.8 million short ton ...
Thursday, 12 January 17
ASIA: COAL'S FUTURE - BENJAMIN SPORTON
As economies develop and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are realised, demand for energy will increase as more peopl ...
Wednesday, 11 January 17
MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE DERMATIS
A new year has dawned upon us and it sure promises to be an exciting one which makes it practically impossible to resist the challenge of making a ...
|
|
|
Showing 2151 to 2155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Coal Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
|
| |
| |
|
