We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 January 17
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.62 MMT OF COAL IN NOVEMBER; UP 4.18% M/M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1,201 Mil ...
Friday, 30 December 16
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION TOTALS 15.2 MMST, DOWN 3.1% - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.2 million sho ...
Thursday, 29 December 16
CHINA AIMS TO CAP COAL-FIRED POWER CAPACITY AT 1,100 GIGAWATTS BY THE END OF 2020 - REUTERS
China aims to cap total primary energy consumption at around 4.4 billion tonnes of coal equivalent in 2017, the director of the National Energy Adm ...
Wednesday, 28 December 16
FINANCIAL MARKETS AND COMMODITY MARKETS HAVE ALREADY SHOWED CONSIDERABLE IMPROVEMENT AND RENEWED OPTIMISM - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
As 2016 nears to a close many will be breathing a heavy sigh of relief, having made it through one of the toughest years in this century and lookin ...
Wednesday, 28 December 16
BUMA SIGNED APPROXIMATELY US$ 493 MILLION WORTH OF MINING SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH PT ADARO INDONESIA AND PT ANGSANA JAYA ENERGY
COALspot.com: PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. Has announced that its primary operating subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ("BUMA") has ...
|
|
|
Showing 2166 to 2170 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
