We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 30 January 17
DUE TO LUNAR YEAR HOLIDAYS, THE FREIGHT MARKET STAYED WEAK
COALspot.com: Due to Lunar year holidays and celebration, the Freight market was down in all segments this past week.
The Baltic Exchange, tra ...
Friday, 27 January 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT RISES FOR THIRD STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.8 million short ton ...
Wednesday, 25 January 17
MARKET INSIGHT - KONSTANTINOS KAKAVITSAS
Remember that old but classic song called “Destination Unknown”? Well that is where the oil market is heading right now. The song made ...
Tuesday, 24 January 17
MARKET UPDATE - ALLIED
This week at the World Economic Forum in the Swiss resort of Davos we had a historic first via the attendance and speech given by China’s pre ...
Monday, 23 January 17
THE PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED $AU 15.279 BILLION WORTH OF 161.399 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 2016
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1,453.1 M ...
|
|
|
Showing 2141 to 2145 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
