We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 10 February 17
U.S. COAL OUTPUT IS ESTIMATED TO HAVE DECLINED BY 158 MMST IN 2016 TO 739 MMST, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 17 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 08 February 17
MARKET INSIGHT - PANOS MAKRINOS
The challenges the oil market has witnessed since the end of 2014 has resulted in a crisis for the global offshore oil and gas exploration industry ...
Tuesday, 07 February 17
WE ARE STILL RIDING ON A WAVE OF MARKET IMPROVEMENT, WITH THE GLOBAL TRADE OF MOST COMMODITIES STILL SHOWING SIGNS OF IMPROVING GROWTH - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The end of 2016 came with a rejuvenated sentiment amongst most traders and investors, in part through the sigh of relief that 2016 was finally comi ...
Monday, 06 February 17
AFTER MONTHS OF GAINS, THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED MONTHLY COAL BENCHMARK PRICE IS STEADILY DROPPING
COALspot.com: Over the past two months, the HBA of Indonesian thermal coal has dropped around 18.06 percent. It sank to $ 83.32 per ton for Februar ...
Monday, 06 February 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET CONTINUED ITS DOWNFALL IN ALL SEGMENTS
COALspot.com: Due to Lunar year holidays and celebration, the Freight market was declined in all segments week ending 27 January. The fall was cont ...
|
|
|
Showing 2131 to 2135 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
