We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 24 February 17
RUSSIAN OIL AND GAS WITHSTANDS OIL PRICE SHOCK - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings says in a new report that the Russian oil and gas sector has withstood the oil price stock of 1H16. Key events of 2016 include record ...
Friday, 24 February 17
US WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT ESTIMATED AT 16.8 MMST - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.8 million short ton ...
Thursday, 23 February 17
ULTRA SUPRAMAX: INDONESIA TO INDIA IS GETTING AROUND $10-11K BASIS SINGAPORE DELIVERY
Supramax
The week started off quietly in the Atlantic with more activity in the Pacific basin.
According to Fearnleys weekly report, frontha ...
Wednesday, 22 February 17
TANKER MARKET INSIGHT - KATERINA RESTIS
In 2016 a session of the IMO committee in London, set the new prerequisites effective from January 2020, which will necessitate global Sulphur cont ...
Tuesday, 21 February 17
INDIA'S JANUARY COAL IMPORTS DECLINE 21.7 PERCENT YEAR -ON-YEAR TO 14.31 MT - PTI
Coal imports declined by 21.7 per cent to 14.31 million tonnes in January as the power utilities did not lift much fuel due to abundant stock avail ...
|
|
|
Showing 2116 to 2120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
