We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 03 March 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ESTIMATED AT 15.7 MMST; DECLINE 6.7% W/W - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.7 million short ton ...
Thursday, 02 March 17
ULTRAMAX: INDONESIA TO INDIA COAL ROUNDS IS BEING FIXED AT AROUND MID 11K BSS SINGAPORE DELIVERY - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Holiday mode within Atlantic i.e. very few movements but rates remained still positive, mostly in the USG region where tight tonnage sup ...
Wednesday, 01 March 17
2017 IS LOOKING LIKE IT WILL BE A GOOD YEAR FOR A NUMBER OF COMMODITIES - LINOS KOGEVINAS
2017 is looking like it will be a good year for a number of commodities. Following the price recovery witnessed in 2016 across a number of commodit ...
Tuesday, 28 February 17
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 17.39% LESS COAL IN JANUARY; TRADE VALUE UP 11.87% M/M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1,625.6 M ...
Monday, 27 February 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS FIRMED UP THIS PAST WEEK; BCI ROSE 57.64% W/W
COALspot.com: The Freight market was firmed up this past week.
The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commod ...
|
|
|
Showing 2111 to 2115 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
