We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 February 17
IF I PLAN TO UNDERTAKE A CHARTERPARTY WITH AN UNFAMILIAR ENTITY, WHAT STEPS CAN I TAKE TO ENSURE THE CHARTERER WILL PAY THEIR HIRE? - SHIPOWNERS' CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Due to the difficult conditions currently existing in the shipping market, particularly in the offshore sector, Members a ...
Wednesday, 15 February 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Looking at the state of the Dry Bulk market exactly a year ago, there is no doubt that there is a significant improvement and despite the fact that ...
Tuesday, 14 February 17
OPTIMISM HAS STARTED TO SLOWLY FLOW BACK INTO THE DRY BULK MARKET - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
Optimism has started to slowly flow back into the dry bulk market, with many in the market showing renewed optimism as the Pacific basin starts to ...
Monday, 13 February 17
COMBINED COAL SALES OF BUMI RESOURCES ROSE TO 87.7 MILLION TONS IN FY'16; UP 10.6 PERCENT Y/Y
COALspot.com: Combined Coal Sales of Bumi Resources rose to 87.7 million tons in FY’16 compared with 79.3 million tons in FY’15. ...
Monday, 13 February 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET CONTINUED TO TUMBLE IN FEBRUARY
COALspot.com: The Freight market was continued its downfall in all segments except Panamax for the week ending 10 February 2017.
The Balt ...
|
|
|
Showing 2126 to 2130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
