We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 10 March 17
ESTIMATED U.S. COAL PRODUCTION ALMOST FLAT WEEK ENDED MARCH 4, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.7 million short ton ...
Friday, 10 March 17
THE 5TH PHILIPPINES POWER AND ELECTRICITY WEEK RETURNS WITH A UNIQUE FOCUS IN 2017
5th Annual Philippines Power & Electricity
18-21 July 2017
Solaire Resort & Casino,Manila, Philippines
http://www.philippinespowe ...
Thursday, 09 March 17
INDONESIAN COAL BENCHMARK PRICE DROPPED FOR A THIRD STRAIGHT MONTH IN MARCH, GOVERNMENT DATA SHOWED
COALspot.com: Indonesian government declared coal benchmark price dropped for a fourth straight month in March, government data showed. The ...
Wednesday, 08 March 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET TODAY PROVIDES MUCH MORE CONFIDENCE COMPARED TO LAST YEAR - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
So what's all the fuss about? During the past five months SnP activity has being surging exponentially in the dry bulk sector. Buyers are looki ...
Monday, 06 March 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS CONTINUING TO FIRM UP THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market was continuing to firm up this past week.
The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk com ...
|
|
|
Showing 2106 to 2110 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|