We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 March 17
CAPESIZE: SHOWING STRENGTH; PANAMAX: VERY QUIET - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The Atlantic market faced less activity from the USG whereas at the Cont tonnage seemed to tighten up with more cargoes emerging. Despit ...
Wednesday, 15 March 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE PANAGOPOULOS
Over the past two weeks, the Dry Baltic Index has been on an upward trend, breaking the 1000 point mark and creating a positive sentiment for the u ...
Tuesday, 14 March 17
ORDERBOOK-TO-FEET RATIO DECREASING; THE FREIGHT MARKET IMPROVING
It seems as though the renewed optimism that has arisen from the recent upward trends being noted in the freight market, the dry bulk market has be ...
Monday, 13 March 17
PORT OF NEWCASTLE HAS SHIPPED 11.563 MILLION TONS COAL IN FEBRUARY 2017; DECLINED 12.19 PERCENT M/M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export ports has shipped $AU 1,4 ...
Monday, 13 March 17
INDO - INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES STAY FIRM
COALspot.com: The Freight market was continuing to firming up.
The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities ros ...
|
|
|
Showing 2101 to 2105 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
|
| |
| |
|
