We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 20 April 17
CHINA'S IMPORT OF IRON ORE TO PROPEL DRY BULK SHIPPING DEMAND IN 2017 - PETER SAND
China's import of iron ore will continue to be a key driver for the demand growth in 2017 for the dry bulk shipping industry, alongside shippin ...
Monday, 17 April 17
THE PANAMAX INDEX (BPI) ROSE (12.89%) WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market was firm, week over a week as all segments show a positive upward trend this past week.
The Baltic Exchange, ...
Monday, 17 April 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT FELL 5% WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.8 million short tons ...
Thursday, 13 April 17
OPEC OVER-DELIVERS ON OIL CUTS, BUT SEES RIVALS' OUTPUT RISING
Crude Oil Price Movements
The OPEC Reference Basket averaged $50.32/b in March, representing a decline of 5.7% from the previous month. Crude fut ...
Wednesday, 12 April 17
THE PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.791 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN MARCH 2017
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export ports has shipped $AU 1,688.5 ...
|
|
|
Showing 2071 to 2075 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
|
| |
| |
|
