We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 05 April 17
THE AVERAGE SECOND HAND PANAMAXES AND CAPES PRICES FOR A 5-YR OLD VESSEL HAS INCREASED MORE THAN 19% AND 20% RESPECTIVELY M/M - INTERMODAL
With the help of what so far appears to be a very strong grain season together with the fact that imports from China have remained so far robust in ...
Tuesday, 04 April 17
THE IRON ORE HAS BEEN ABLE TO KEEP ITS GROWTH PATH FAIRLY WELL; THERE IS STILL ONE PART OF THE WORLD THAT IS STILL HEAVILY COMMITTED TO COAL
With the close of March having let us with a very positive after taste and having witnessed near the end of the month the Baltic Dry Index at its h ...
Monday, 03 April 17
WORLD COAL TRADE STABLE IN 2016: DEMAND SHIFTS TO SOUTH-EAST ASIA - ASSOCARBONI
ASSOCARBONI: Coal confirmed as the leading fuel for electricity generation, accounting for 40% of overall production in 2016.
World coal trade ...
Monday, 03 April 17
DRY BULK RATES CONTINUING TO FIRMING UP
COALspot.com: The Freight market was continuing to firming up. Baltic Panamax Index rose 12.81 percent week over week.
The Baltic Exchang ...
Friday, 31 March 17
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION INCREASE SLIGHTLY WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.5 million short tons ...
|
|
|
Showing 2081 to 2085 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
