We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 April 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - VASSILIS VASSILIOU
The first quarter of 2017 started relatively busy for the ship repair sector, with most of the repair facilities being nearly fully occupied till t ...
Monday, 10 April 17
THE CAPE INDEX WAS DOWN BY 16.32% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market was steady week over a week except for Cape. The cape index was down 16.32 percent week over week.
The Baltic ...
Friday, 07 April 17
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED SPOT COAL PRICES STAGE FIRST INCREASE OF THE YEAR
COALspot.com: Indonesian government declared coal benchmark price rose slightly in April, government data showed.
The benchmark price of Indon ...
Friday, 07 April 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT ALMOST FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.5 million short tons ...
Thursday, 06 April 17
PANAMAX: THE MARKET HAS CONTINUED THE FIRM SENTIMENT FROM LAST WEEK IN BOTH HEMISPHERES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
With holidays in Asia, the week has started very slow in Pacific. Some fixtures have still been done and levels have remained quite stab ...
|
|
|
Showing 2076 to 2080 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
|
| |
| |
|
