We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 28 April 17
U.S PRODUCED LESS COAL THIS PAST WEEK COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 14 million short tons ( ...
Friday, 28 April 17
DELTA DUNIA RECORDED $24 MILLION NET PROFIT FOR FIRST QUARTER OF 2017; UP 700% Y/Y
COALspot.com: PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. has announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2017 yesterday. According to the ...
Thursday, 27 April 17
PACIFIC IS SOFTENING WITH MORE TONNAGE OPENING AND LESS COAL ORDERS AROUND - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Relatively slow week, with both basins showing signs of cooling down. Although grain cargoes out ECSA and ECCA on Ultras still delivered ...
Wednesday, 26 April 17
IRON ORE PRICES HAVE BEEN ON A ROLLERCOASTER RIDE OVER THE LAST MONTH - CHRISTOPHER WHITTY
Iron ore prices have been on a rollercoaster ride over the last month. Prices started the year on a very positive note, surging up to their highest ...
Tuesday, 25 April 17
FIONA POUNDS: VALID TENDER OF NOTICE OF READINESS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the recent English High Court case of MV Arundel Castle1, the Judge ruled that a vessel, that could not immediately pr ...
|
|
|
Showing 2061 to 2065 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
|
| |
| |
|
