We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 May 17
SLOW AND UNEVENTFUL WEEK FOR THE PANAMAX MARKET
Supramax
In the Atlantic, only USG were showing some improvement, where pet-coke cargoes to India was fixed in the range of 19-23k daily and to C ...
Wednesday, 10 May 17
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Up until a few weeks ago, demo deals were being concluded at just a fraction below $400/ldt. Last time we saw demo prices around that level was in ...
Tuesday, 09 May 17
DRY BULK TRADE IS STILL HEAVILY RELIANT ON CHINA - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
We have seen an overall cool down in the dry bulk and tanker markets over the final two weeks of April, sparking worries amongst ship-owners that t ...
Monday, 08 May 17
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE RISES FOR SECOND STRAIGHT MONTH IN MAY
COALspot.com: Indonesian government declared coal benchmark price rose in May, government data showed.
The benchmark price of Indonesian therm ...
Monday, 08 May 17
OCEAN BULK CARGO RATES FALL FURTHER THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market continues to slump this past week, with all segments show a negative downward trend week over week.
The Balti ...
|
|
|
Showing 2051 to 2055 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
|
| |
| |
|
