We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 May 17
LR MARKET IT SEEMS THAT EARNINGS ARE STILL UNDER PRESSURE - INTERMODAL
As we are approaching the summer season, the Clean Product market appears poised to become more challenging, either on East or West of Suez.
L ...
Tuesday, 23 May 17
TANKERS WEEKLY MARKET NOTE - ALLIED
It’s been a turbulent couple of weeks on the oil front, with the effectiveness of OPEC’s policy being under debate amongst most traders ...
Monday, 22 May 17
THE SHIPPING INDEX DECLINES AGAIN
COALspot.com: The Freight market again decline this past week, as BDI and all other indexes show a negative trend week over week.
The Baltic E ...
Friday, 19 May 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 1.2% WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 13.5 million short ton ...
Thursday, 18 May 17
SUPRAMAX : COAL TRIPS TO CHINA WITH VESSELS OPEN INDO HAVE BEEN FIXED AROUND $8000
Supramax
Atlantic market has stayed quiet with no substantial developments.
Cont to Med scrap cargoes have concluded around 11k says Fearnle ...
|
|
|
Showing 2041 to 2045 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
