We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 18 May 17
SOUTHEAST ASIA CAN ACCELERATE ACHIEVEMENT OF PARIS AGREEMENT GOALS - WCA
Low emissions coal in Asia reduces more CO2 emissions than renewable investment in Western Europe.
Investing in low emissions coal plants in S ...
Wednesday, 17 May 17
THE CHINESE IMPORTS ARE A BAROMETER FOR VESSEL UTILIZATION - INTERMODAL
According to economic data, China imports increased year-on-year 38% in February, 20% in March – which is approximately US$160-170b - w ...
Monday, 15 May 17
THE PORT OF NEWCASTLE HAS SHIPPED 0.99 PERCENT LESS COAL IN APRIL 2017
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports, and the world’s largest coal export ports has shipped $AU 1,636.2 ...
Monday, 15 May 17
THE CAPESIZE INDEX ROSE SIGNIFICANTLY THIS PAST WEEK COMPARED TO PREVIOUS WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market slightly up this past week, as BDI and Cape shows a positive trend week over week.
The Baltic Exchange, track ...
Friday, 12 May 17
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION DOWN AGAIN WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.3 million short tons ...
|
|
|
Showing 2046 to 2050 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Planning Commission, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
