We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 June 17
INDO HBA INDEX SEE LARGEST DROP SINCE FEBRUARY 2017
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal benchmark price decline 9.96% in June, government data showed.
The benchmark price of Indonesian thermal coal de ...
Wednesday, 07 June 17
MARKET INSIGHT - PANOS MAKRINOS
2017 undoubtedly began with very optimistic signs for the future of the Oil & Gas industry on the back of the Vienna Agreement. OPEC and non-OP ...
Tuesday, 06 June 17
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS CONTINUE TO TUMBLE THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Freight market continued to tumble this past week, as BDI and cape index showed a negative trend week over week.
The Baltic ...
Friday, 02 June 17
THE WORLD COAL ASSOCIATION HAS RESPONDED TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED STATES FROM THE PARIS AGREEMENT
“This decision is the result of a failure to build a genuine coalition on climate action that recognises the role of all technologies, includ ...
Friday, 02 June 17
MOL SIGNS COAL TRANSPORT DEAL WITH THERMAL POWERTECH CORPORATION INDIA LIMITED
MOL Signs Coal Transport Deal with Thermal Powertech Corporation India Limited - Contributing to a Stable Power Supply in India -
Jun ...
|
|
|
Showing 2031 to 2035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
