We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 June 17
MARKET INSIGHT - SHIPPING
Looking back at March and April shipping reports when the dry bulk indexes were starting to move up, a number of shipping analysts were stating tha ...
Tuesday, 20 June 17
WORLD ECONOMY SHOWS A MORE OPTIMISTIC TREND
During the past weeks, we have seen many organizations and think tanks show a more optimistic face with regards to the world economy. The World Ban ...
Monday, 19 June 17
PANAMAX RATES HELP BALTIC INDEX TO A POSITIVE MOVE
COALspot.com: The Freight market rose very marginally this past week compared to the previous week, as BDI and Panamax indexes show a positive tren ...
Friday, 16 June 17
WEEKLY U.S. COAL PRODUCTION RISES; UP 24.1% Y/Y
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.5 million short tonn ...
Thursday, 15 June 17
SUPRAMAX NICKEL ORE FROM PHILIPPINES TO S. CHINA PAYING AROUND MID $10000 - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Market looked more promising from both sides of the basins. Within Atlantic USG returned with tick better rates seen as tonnage kept tig ...
|
|
|
Showing 2021 to 2025 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
|
| |
| |
|