We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 June 17
WORLD COAL PRODUCTION FELL BY 6.2%, THE LARGEST ANNUAL DECLINE ON RECORD - BP
COALspot.com: The 2017 edition of the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, shows global energy markets continuing to undergo long-term changes as ...
Wednesday, 14 June 17
HANDYSIZES AND PANAMAXES ENJOY THE TIGHTEST SUPPLY - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
The dry and the tanker shipping segments have dissimilar exposure to supply-driven opportunity (or risk). While the vintage (i.e., over 15 years ol ...
Tuesday, 13 June 17
THE TANKER FREIGHT MARKET IS STILL UNDER PRESSURE - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
News of U.S. inventory decline has hit the market by surprise with prices of the commodity showing some quick revival as OPEC continues to push wit ...
Monday, 12 June 17
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX TOOK A POSITIVE STEP
COALspot.com: The Freight market incline this past week compared to the previous week, as BDI, Cape and Panamax indexes show a positive trend week ...
Friday, 09 June 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT WAS FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15 million short tonnes ...
|
|
|
Showing 2026 to 2030 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
|
| |
| |
|
