We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 05 July 17
TROUBLE SEEMS TO BE LOOMING ONCE MORE IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
Trouble seems to be looming once more in the steel industry as US President Trump puts forth his plans for specialist protectionist measures for th ...
Friday, 30 June 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT SLIGHTLY DOWN
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.6 million short tonn ...
Wednesday, 28 June 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
From the beginning of the year until now SnP activity has changed significantly. To put things into perspective, after a fast and furious q1 on the ...
Monday, 26 June 17
PANAMAX/KAMARMAXES HAD A STRONG WEEK WITH RATES RISING IN MOST AREAS OF THE MARKET - BALTICEXCHANGE
Capesize
A dark cloud appeared to have descended over the market for the big ships with rates continuing to slide in all areas. There was a repor ...
Friday, 23 June 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED APPROXIMATELY 15.8 MMST; UP 1.8% W/W
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.8 million short tonn ...
|
|
|
Showing 2016 to 2020 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
