We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 November 17
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR 3.9 MILLION TONS OF 5700 NAR AND 5400 NAR COAL FOR 2018 - 2020 DELIVERY
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an another new tender for total 3,900,000 Metric Tons of min. 570 ...
Thursday, 16 November 17
THE PORT OF NEWCASTLE HAS SHIPPED 14.94 PERCENT LESS COAL IN OCTOBER 2017, DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports, and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1,466.8 ...
Thursday, 16 November 17
GOVERNMENT, 13 COAL MINERS AGREE TO CHANGE CONTRACTS - JP
The government and 13 coal mining companies have agreed to change the old Contract of Work (CoW), as part of the implementation of Law No. 4/20199 ...
Wednesday, 15 November 17
IEA RECOGNISES COAL'S CONTINUOUS IMPORTANCE TO GLOBAL ENERGY NEEDS - WCA
The World Coal Association (WCA) has welcomed the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) recognition that coal will continue to play a vital rol ...
Wednesday, 15 November 17
THERMAL COAL WAS DRAGGED DOWN BY THE WEAKNESS ACROSS THE WIDER ENERGY SECTOR - DANIEL HYNES
The coal market was mixed.
Thermal coal was dragged down by the weakness across the wider energy sector, said Daniel Hynes Senior Commodi ...
|
|
|
Showing 1876 to 1880 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
