We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 November 17
THERMAL COAL MARKETS WERE A LITTLE BIT MORE SUBDUED - DANIEL HYNES, ANZ
Coal prices were stronger, led by gains in coking coal. Premium hard coking coal jumped above USD200/t for the first time in two months, said Danie ...
Wednesday, 29 November 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - VASILIS MOIRIS
In line with most expectations for the end of this month, during the past days the Dry Bulk market realized a significant rebound that sent the BDI ...
Tuesday, 28 November 17
THE DRY BULK MARKET HAS SHOWN A REMARKABLE RECOVERY THIS YEAR - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The Dry Bulk market has shown a remarkable recovery this year with the average earnings having increased by around 63% this year so far compared to ...
Friday, 24 November 17
U.S. PRODUCED 14.9 MMST FOR THE WEEK ENDING NOV 18; UP 0.9% W/W - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.9 million short ton ...
Thursday, 23 November 17
PANAMAX: ANOTHER SLOW AND UNEVENTFUL WEEK; DECREASING FREIGHT RATES IN BOTH HEMISPHERES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
A quiet start to the week. USG closed last week a bit tighter, and continued into the new week on a positive tone with little concluded, ...
|
|
|
Showing 1866 to 1870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
