We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 November 17
THERMAL COAL WAS FLAT AMID CONCERNS OF FURTHER GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN CHINA, SAYS DANIEL HYNES
Coal prices were mixed. Thermal coal was flat amid concerns of further government intervention in China, said Daniel Hynes Senior Commodity Strateg ...
Wednesday, 22 November 17
CHINA CONSUMES MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS OF THE GLOBAL SEABORNE IRON ORE MARKET; PRODUCES AS MUCH STEEL AS THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
China consumes more than two-thirds of the global seaborne iron ore market and at the same time produces as much steel as the rest of the world com ...
Monday, 20 November 17
INDONESIAN COAL BENCHMARK PRICE SURGES 0.86% TO $94.80 A TON, GOVERNMENT DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal benchmark price surges 0.86% in November compared to declared price in October, the latest ministerial decree showed. ...
Friday, 17 November 17
U.S. PRODUCED 678.8 MMST OF COAL YEAR TO DATE; 9% UP Y/Y, EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.8 million short ton ...
Thursday, 16 November 17
PANAMAX ACTIVITIES HAVE SLOWED DOWN QUITE SUBSTANTIALLY THE LAST WEEK - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Another week with rates easing over all the Supra routes within Atlantic.
Front hauls from USG got payed around 21-22k daily and ul ...
|
|
|
Showing 1871 to 1875 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
