We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 10 November 17
U.S. COAL OUTPUT FOR THE FIRST 10 MONTHS OF 2017 IS ESTIMATED AT AROUND 656 MMST; UP10% YOY - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 08 November 17
COAL MARKETS WERE MIXED; COKING COAL EKING OUT SOME GAINS; THERMAL COAL STRUGGLING - DANIEL HYNES
Coal markets were mixed, with coking coal eking out some gains, while thermal coal struggled amid the falling oil prices, ANZ Strategist said in a ...
Wednesday, 08 November 17
WEEKLY SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT
If you are a dry bulk owner today you are definitely feeling the pressure of the past couple of years off and given the admittedly unexpected growt ...
Wednesday, 08 November 17
NEW QUAY OPENED AT THE INDUSTRIAL PORT IN BREMEN,GERMAN
Press Release: After a building period lasting three-and-a-half years, the port logistics firm Weserport, the “bremenports” comp ...
Tuesday, 07 November 17
ING JOINS FORCES ON BLOCKCHAIN-BASED PLATFORM FOR ENERGY COMMODITIES SECTOR
Blockchain technology. It’s often been described as the most important invention in computing in a generation.
So it should come as no s ...
|
|
|
Showing 1886 to 1890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
