We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 December 22
AUSTRALIA TO CAP PRICES OF COAL, GAS TO DRIVE DOWN ENERGY BILLS - REUTERS
Australia will cap coal and gas prices for a year in a bid to shave utility bills for households and businesses hit by soaring costs because of the ...
Tuesday, 13 December 22
YANCOAL AUSTRALIA TO PREPAY $459 MLN DEBT AS RECORD COAL PRICES BOOST CASHFLOWS - REUTERS
Coal miner Yancoal Australia Ltd. said on Friday it intended to prepay $459 million of its debt on or around Dec. 16, as elevated coal prices were ...
Tuesday, 13 December 22
WHY COAL LEADS THE RISE IN COMMODITIES THIS YEAR - MARKETWATCH
This year marked a resurgence for coal, often known — and loathed — by environmentalists as the dirtiest energy source, with prices mor ...
Thursday, 08 December 22
BIMCO TO REVISE WAR RISK CLAUSES
Work to revise the BIMCO War Cancellation Clause 2004, the BIMCO War Risks Clause for Time Chartering 2013 (CONWARTIME 2013) and the BIMCO War Risk ...
Thursday, 08 December 22
COAL ROYALTY PAYMENTS BOOST AUSTRALIAN STATE'S BUDGET FORECAST - REUTERS
Australia’s Queensland state on Wednesday forecast a record surplus for the current financial year, largely driven by higher royalty payments ...
|
|
|
Showing 171 to 175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Planning Commission, India
- The University of Queensland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
