We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 November 18
COAL FETCHES 102% PREMIUM IN E-AUCTION, SURPASSING THE EARLIER HIGHEST OF 95% - FINANCIAL EXPRESS
Coal prices have received a premium of 102% in spot e-auction during September 2018, surpassing the earlier highest of 95% premium during the spot ...
Friday, 02 November 18
CHINA: COAL CONSUMPTION POSTS STRONG GROWTH ON BACK OF POWER GENERATION DEMAND - CHINA DAILY
China’s energy consumption experienced continuous rebound during the first three quarters in 2018, National Energy Administration announced o ...
Thursday, 01 November 18
IMO 2020 - EXPLORING THE OPTION OF SOX SCRUBBERS - SIDDHARTH MAHAJAN, GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
There are four possible methods of compliance:
1.use VLSFO (very low Sulphur oil) or blends;
2,use dis ...
Wednesday, 31 October 18
INDIA: COAL IMPORTS SURGE ON DOMESTIC SHORT SUPPLY - HINDU
Shortage of thermal coal supply in India has pushed imports up to 85 million tonnes (mt) in the first half of the current fiscal compared to 75 mt ...
Wednesday, 31 October 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - APOSTOLOS ROMPOPOULOS
Since the IMO’s 2020 global cap on sulphur in marine fuels is coming into force, ship-owners have to decide whether they will operate using e ...
|
|
|
Showing 1571 to 1575 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|