We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 19
KOMIPO INVITED BITUMINOUS COAL BIDS FOR BORYEONG & SHIN BORYEONG POWER PLANTS
South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for 260,000 MT MT of min. 5700 NAR coal and 240,000 MT of min. 4,600 k ...
Sunday, 23 June 19
SUPRAMAX: A 56,000-DWT WAS FIXED FROM INDONESIA TO VIETNAM AT $10,000 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The story over the past week has been largely Atlantic dominated as the basin’s uniquely volatile characteristics came into play ...
Saturday, 22 June 19
OPEC'S BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF THE OIL MARKET - WOOD MACKENZIE
Oil supply is confounding expectations. We have just raised our forecasts for non-OPEC production, the latest in a series of incremental increases. ...
Friday, 21 June 19
INDONESIA'S BAYAN RESOURCES SIGNED A COAL SUPPLY AGREEMENT WITH THE BANGLADESH BCPCL TO SUPPLY 23 MILLION TONS OF COAL FOR 10 YEARS
On Monday, 17th June 2019, PT. Bayan Resources signed a Coal supply Agreement with the Bangladesh- China Power Company (Pvt.) Limited. BCPCL is a j ...
Thursday, 20 June 19
BUMI RESOURCES EXPECTS TO SELL 42 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN FIRST HALF - JAKARTA POST
PT Bumi Resources (BUMI), Indonesia's largest thermal coal miner, expects to close the first half of this year with coal sales of 42 million to ...
|
|
|
Showing 1376 to 1380 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
