We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 03 July 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The global shipping industry is facing numerous challenges at a time when geopolitical turmoil has escalated in view of the recent tension in the M ...
Monday, 01 July 19
COAL DEMAND RISES, BUT REMAINS BELOW PEAK LEVELS - FORBES
This article is the third in a series on BP’s recently-released Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. The Review provides a comprehensive ...
Saturday, 29 June 19
ULTRAMAX: FROM SOUTHEAST ASIA MORE COAL WAS ENTERING THE MARKET - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The market showed variability over the past week, as most routes were active yet sentiment differed from region to region. The Pacific ...
Wednesday, 26 June 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As the first half of the year is almost over, it is worth looking back at the sale and purchase activity during these months, focusing on the segme ...
Tuesday, 25 June 19
THERMAL COAL FUTURES ON THE ZHENGSHOU EXCHANGE ROSE - DANIEL HYNES
Coal markets were buoyed by ongoing supply side issues.
According to Daniel Hynes, Senior Commodity Strategist of ANZ, the the ...
|
|
|
Showing 1371 to 1375 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
