We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 June 19
IMO 2020 - COUNTDOWN TO 1 JANUARY 2020 -HOW WILL THE CHANGES AFFECT REFINING AND SHIPPING? - WOOD MACKENZIE
We know that the IMO’s regulations represent the biggest step change the shipping industry has ever seen and the implications will be felt th ...
Wednesday, 12 June 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
This year’s tanker S&P activity keeps edging higher compared to the same period in 2018. Year to date we have seen some 143 ships, rangin ...
Tuesday, 11 June 19
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE SET AT $81.48 PER TON IN JUNE, DOWN 15.66 PERCENT YEAR-ON-YEAR
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down again the benchmark price of Indonesian th ...
Monday, 10 June 19
CONSECUTIVE OWNERS OF CARGO: WHO HOLDS TITLE AND THE RIGHT TO SUE? - COLIN BIGGERS & PAISLEY
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In Tritton Resources Pty Ltd v Ever Rock Navigation S.A. [2019] FCA 276, the Federal Court considered the application of ...
Monday, 10 June 19
KOSPO INVITES BIDS FOR 1,305,000 MT OF MIN 5600 KCAL/KG NCV COAL FOR SEPT 2019 TO DEC 2021
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Southern Power Co. Ltd (KOSPO) issued a tender for 435,000 MT (per year) of max 5,600 kcal/kg N ...
|
|
|
Showing 1386 to 1390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
