We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 16 July 19
SUPRAMAX: THE ASIAN ARENA WAS SPLIT, WITH A BUILD-UP OF TONNAGE AND LACK OF ENQUIRY IN THE NORTH - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
It was a Brazilian affair with a strong splash of bunkers characterising the Capesize market over the past week. Largely traded in Eur ...
Wednesday, 10 July 19
KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER INVITES BIDS FOR HCV AND LCV COAL FOR AUGUST 2019 LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea South-East Power Co., Ltd. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for total 460,000 to 500,000 Metric To ...
Wednesday, 10 July 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In contrast with the general expectations for the dry bulk market, the sector was not positive or even stable during the past 6 months. The warning ...
Monday, 08 July 19
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE POSTS BIGGEST MONTHLY LOSS SINCE JANUARY 2017
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down again the benchmark price of Indonesian th ...
Monday, 08 July 19
ULTRAMAX: A 52,000-TONNER OPEN CJK FIXED FOR A TRIP VIA INDONESIA WITH RE-DELIVERY CHINA AT $6,100 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market surged over the past week, reaching highs not seen since August last year. Widespread activity in both basins saw ...
|
|
|
Showing 1366 to 1370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Planning Commission, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
