We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 December 19
AUSTRALIA ENERGY MARKET OPERATOR TURNS SCROOGE ON COAL LOBBY: RUSSELL
Australia, which vies with Indonesia for the title of the world’s largest coal exporter, is planning for an electricity future where use of t ...
Tuesday, 17 December 19
BACK TO FUTURE FOR BUSH AS AUSTRALIA CONSIDERS MOVING AWAY FROM COAL NEWCASTLE - HERALD
Looking backwards could show the way forward for regional communities planning for a future beyond mining.
One of Australia’s ...
Tuesday, 17 December 19
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.01 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 133.16 points, down 0.01 percent week on week.
The index, released by China Taiy ...
Tuesday, 17 December 19
YEAR 2019: IT IS LOOKING SET THAT THIS YEAR WILL BE ONE OF THE SLOWEST IN TERMS OF DRY BULK NEWBUILDING ACTIVITY - ALLIED
With just two weeks remaining before 2019 comes to an end, it is now looking set that this year will be one of the slowest in terms of dry bulk new ...
Monday, 16 December 19
ULTRAMAX: A 63,000DWT SHIP FIXING DELIVERY FOR A SINGAPORE TRIP VIA INDONESIA, FOR RE-DELIVERY TO CHINA AT $11,000 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
It was one-way traffic for the Capesize market this past week, with all routes giving up value. While downward momentum may have slowe ...
|
|
|
Showing 1241 to 1245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
