We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 December 19
COAL POWER GENERATION CONTINUES TO DECLINE IN GERMANY: DESTATIS, XINHUA REPORTED
The volume of electricity generated in coal-fired power plants in Germany decreased “markedly” by 37 percent to 34 billion kilowatt-hou ...
Thursday, 19 December 19
BANGLADESH'S NBR CUTS VAT ON COAL IMPORT FOR POWER PLANTS - THE DAILY STAR
The National Board of Revenue (NBR) reduced value added tax on the import of coal for power plants to 5 percent from present 15 percent for five ye ...
Wednesday, 18 December 19
AVERAGE PRICES OF COAL IN 2018 WERE MORE THAN 60% HIGHER THAN IN 2016 - IEA
Coal use grew again in 2018.
Global coal demand increased by 1.1%, continuing the rebound that began in 2017 after three years of decline ...
Wednesday, 18 December 19
ASIA IS SET TO SUPPORT GLOBAL COAL DEMAND FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS - IEA
Press Release: Global coal demand is expected to decline in 2019 but remain broadly stable over the next five years, supported by robust growth in ...
Wednesday, 18 December 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we all know very well by now, the reduction in the maximum allowable sulphur content of marine fuels in 2020 is likely to have a massive impact ...
|
|
|
Showing 1236 to 1240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- MS Steel International - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
