We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 07 December 19
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE DROPS SLIGHTLY - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price dropped slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge ...
Saturday, 07 December 19
SOUTH AFRICAN COAL PRICE SURGE, WHILE OTHERS LANGUISH, IS TROUBLING - REUTERS
Coal prices around the world are gently sliding as demand from top importers such as China, India and even Europe remains subdued amid a so far mil ...
Saturday, 07 December 19
SUPRAMAX: OVERALL, THE BALTIC SUPRAMAX INDEX REMAINED IN POSITIVE MODE, DESPITE SOME AREAS LACKING FRESH ACTIVITY - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
This week the Capesize market maintained healthy earnings, as an end of year surge took the Capesize 5TC back up to $25,202 by mid-wee ...
Friday, 06 December 19
INDONESIA COAL BENCHMARK PRICE FOR DECEMBER INCREASES BY US 3 CENTS MOM
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised up the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal co ...
Thursday, 05 December 19
IMO 2020 IS ABOUT TO GET REAL - GAVIN THOMPSON
As I write this edition of the APAC Energy Buzz from my desk in Singapore I can see ships. Lots of ships. No surprise given that Singapore is among ...
|
|
|
Showing 1251 to 1255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
