We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 22 December 19
NMDC DIVERSIFIES INTO COAL MINING - THE HINDU
Iron ore mining major NMDC has been allocated two coal blocks in Jharkhand for commercial mining by the Union Ministry of Coal.
Both ...
Sunday, 22 December 19
TRADING PLACES FOR 2020 - BALTIC EXCHANGE
In the sea of 2020 predictions, Saxo Bank’s Outrageous Predictions sail their own very unique course. For nearly 20 years the Danish investme ...
Saturday, 21 December 19
SUPRAMAX: A 63,000 DWT VESSEL, OPEN CIGADING, FIXED A TRIP VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY WEST COAST INDIA, AT $8,500 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market this past week has been attempting to recalibrate itself in consideration of weakening freight levels and increasi ...
Saturday, 21 December 19
SHIPPING'S SUPPLY AND DEMAND TRENDING OFF BALANCE - BIMCO
One of the most worrying trends that has developed recently – which will affect shipping demand in the years to come – is the falling t ...
Friday, 20 December 19
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
|
|
|
Showing 1231 to 1235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The University of Queensland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
|
| |
| |
|
