We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 11 January 20
BALTIC BRIEFING TANKER REPORT - WEEK 2
VLCC
Escalating tensions between the USA and Iran, in addition to a continuing strong market, made for an interesting week, with rates firming ...
Saturday, 11 January 20
SUPRAMAX: INDONESIA COAL RUNS, A 58,000DWT SHIP WAS RUMOURED FIXED DELIVERY KALIMANTAN, REDELIVERY WEST COAST INDIA, IN THE $4,000S - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Closing out the first full trading week of 2020, the Capesize market is struggling to gain any solid positive upward traction. Opening ...
Friday, 10 January 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remains flat
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
...
Thursday, 09 January 20
NEW IMO LIFEBOAT REQUIREMENTS ENTER INTO FORCE - STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Three new compulsory IMO resolutions entered into force on 1 January 2020. These resolutions deal with the maintenance, t ...
Thursday, 09 January 20
INDIA'S NEW EASED MINING RULES TO ENHANCE FOREIGN PARTICIPATION IN COAL SECTOR: MINISTER
India’s cabinet has eased mining laws in a bid to attract foreign players to the domestic coal sector and reduce imports of the fuel, coal mi ...
|
|
|
Showing 1201 to 1205 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
