We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 January 20
SUPRAMAX: A NUMBER OF INDONESIAN ROUND TRIPS WERE REPORTED AT BELLOW USD 5,000 PD LEVELS - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
The Capesize market has hit new low's in the first week of the new year, with the West Australia route being fixed at USD 6.6 being ...
Wednesday, 08 January 20
WHAT IS BIMCO THINKING ABOUT 2020? - BIMCO
Every year, BIMCO considers what is in store for the shipping industry and for BIMCO in the coming years, while also reflecting on the year gone by ...
Wednesday, 08 January 20
VINACOMIN SETS TO SELL 49 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN 2020 - VIETNAM NET
The Vietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited (Vinacomin) has set to sell 49 million tonnes of coal in 2020, a year-on-y ...
Wednesday, 08 January 20
CHINA'S COAL-RICH PROVINCE CUTS 18.95 MLN TONNES OF CAPACITY IN 2019 - XINHUA
North China’s Shanxi Province reduced its coal production capacity by 18.95 million tonnes by closing 18 coal mines in 2019.
A ...
Wednesday, 08 January 20
JANUARY INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE SLIPS US$ 0.37 MOM
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal ...
|
|
|
Showing 1206 to 1210 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
|
| |
| |
|
