We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 January 20
MABUX: BUNKER MARKET THIS MORNING, JAN.14
MABUX World Bunker Index (consists of a range of prices for 380 HSFO, 180 HSFO and MGO (Gasoil) in the main world hubs) changed insignificant and i ...
Tuesday, 14 January 20
SHIPPING MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED SHIPBROKING
Uncertainty in the global geopolitical sphere seems to have not come to an end along with 2019, as 2020 commenced with renewed tensions between the ...
Tuesday, 14 January 20
DRY BULK MARKET: "THIS IS NOT THE END OF COAL" SAYS IEA - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A historic drop in coal-fired electricity generation will not sway global coal demand from its upward trajectory through to 2024, though growth wil ...
Saturday, 11 January 20
ARE YOU 95% CONFIDENT THAT YOUR VERY LOW SULPHUR FUEL IS ON SPEC AND MARPOL COMPLIANT? - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Bunker fuel is a commodity and, like all commodities, is produced and sold according to specifications. Bunkers are usual ...
Saturday, 11 January 20
NEW PRICING COULD SPELL TROUBLE FOR CHINA'S COAL SECTOR - CHINA DIALOGUE
Benchmark coal tariffs have been the foundation of China’s electricity pricing since 2004 but this mechanism was replaced on January 1 with a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1196 to 1200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
