We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 January 20
SUPRAMAX: INDO/CHINA ROUND VOYAGE FIXING AROUND LOW/MID USD 6,000 BSS APS INDO - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Still very rough seas for the big ships, with the majority of the fleet trading Far East or fronthaul and consequently earning far les ...
Wednesday, 15 January 20
ASIA PACIFIC GAS AND LNG - 6 THEMES TO WATCH IN 2020 - WOOD MACKENZIE
NEWS RELEASE
Wood Mackenzie has identified six themes that will impact Asia Pacific’s gas and LNG markets in 2020
Asian LNG spot pr ...
Wednesday, 15 January 20
PREDICTIONS FOR 2020: 'SLOWBALISATION" IS THE NEW GLOBALISATION - PWC
Projecting what the future holds is an important exercise for businesses looking to plan ahead. Below we present a summary of some of the themes we ...
Wednesday, 15 January 20
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INERMODAL
Happy New Year and all the best for IMO 2020 !!
The early days of IMO 2020 coming into force have certainly had an impact on the indus ...
Tuesday, 14 January 20
SOLAS AMENDMENTS ENTERING INTO FORCE 1 JANUARY 2020 - STANDARD CLUB
While the latest amendments to MARPOL annex VI which entered into force on 1 January 2020 limiting the SOx emissions from ships has been the centre ...
|
|
|
Showing 1191 to 1195 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Planning Commission, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
|
| |
| |
|
