We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 14 February 20
KOWEPO INVITED BIDS FOR 1.275 MILLION TONS OF MIN. 5,600 NCV COAL
COALspot.com: Korea Western Power Co. Ltd (KOWEPO). as a representative of five Korean Gencos has issued an international tender for total 1,275,00 ...
Friday, 14 February 20
IS THE US COAL INDUSTRY COMPLETELY BURNED OUT? -FORBES
This is the fourth of a multi-part series on the state of the main sources of energy in the US and how they compare globally. The series will cover ...
Friday, 14 February 20
FITCH RTGS: GLOBAL PORTS VULNERABLE TO CORONAVIRUS - RELATED VOLUME DECLINES
Global ports will see reduced trade volumes as a result of the coronavirus, COVID-19, which would become more severe should Chinese production take ...
Thursday, 13 February 20
INDIA: MAJOR PORTS SHOW MUTED GROWTH IN CARGO AS THERMAL COAL VOLUME SLIDES 15% - BUSINESS STANDARD
A sharp slide of 15 per cent in thermal coal volumes weighed on the performance of major ports during the period of April-January of FY20. The majo ...
Wednesday, 12 February 20
REFINING SET FOR A CHALLENGING 2020 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Downstream isn’t the glamorous end of the oil business. And in Big Oil, it’s typically dwarfed by upstream. Yet having been forced to r ...
|
|
|
Showing 1136 to 1140 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|