We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 February 20
MINERS WELCOME INDONESIA'S NEW JOBS BILL THAT COULD SPUR COAL GROWTH - REUTERS
Miners have welcomed proposed changes to Indonesian mining rules under a new law aimed at boosting investment, though critics are concerned that th ...
Wednesday, 19 February 20
AS OCEAN TEMPERATURES RISE, SHIPOWNERS LOOK FOR WAYS TO COPE - WARTSILA
The world is heating up, and its oceans are no exception. According to the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the oceans absorb the majo ...
Wednesday, 19 February 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The coronavirus outbreak is estimated to negatively affect global economy by at least EUR400bn this year, representing around the 0.4% of global GD ...
Tuesday, 18 February 20
WEEKLY MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED
Under such poorly performing market circumstances, many usually take the historical approach, in order to better understand and further analyze the ...
Tuesday, 18 February 20
ADARO SHIPPED 27 PERCENT OF ITS TOTAL COAL PRODUCTION IN 2019 TO INDIA AND CHINA
PT Adaro Energy Tbk (AE) produced 58.03 Mt of coal from PT Adaro Indonesia (AI), Balangan Coal Companies and Adaro Me ...
|
|
|
Showing 1121 to 1125 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Coal Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The University of Queensland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
