We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 10 March 20
CHINA'S COAL-RICH PROVINCE ENSURES ENERGY SUPPLY AMID EPIDEMIC - XINHUA
China’s coal-rich province of Shanxi has seen more than 500 coal mines resume production in February, which ensured energy supply amid the ou ...
Monday, 09 March 20
OPEC+ 'NO DEAL' A BLOW TO THE MARKET - WOOD MACKENZIE
Speaking after today’s OPEC+ meeting broke up, Ann-Louise Hittle, vice president, Macro Oils, at Wood Mackenzie, said: “Today’s o ...
Monday, 09 March 20
KOREA EAST-WEST POWER INVITED BIDS FOR 150,000 MT OF MIN 4,400 - MAX 5,499 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: KOREA EAST-WEST POWER CO. LTD. of South Korea has issued an international tender for total 150,000 MT of LCV coal for May – Jun ...
Sunday, 08 March 20
SUPRAMAX: A 55,000DWT VESSEL FIXING DELIVERY FROM EAST KALIMANTAN FOR A TRIP TO VIETNAM AT $9,100 - BALTIC BRIEFING
SUPRAMAX/ULTRAMAX - A 56,000DWT VESSEL FIXED DELIVERY SOUTH CHINA TRIP VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY EAST COAST INDIA, IN THE $6,000S
SUPRAMAX/U ...
Friday, 06 March 20
CHINA RESUMES 83.4 PCT COAL PRODUCTION CAPACITY AMID EPIDEMIC - XINHUA
China has resumed 83.4 percent of its coal production capacity amid the fight against the novel coronavirus outbreak, the National Energy Administr ...
|
|
|
Showing 1081 to 1085 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
