We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 April 20
STRONGER BUNKER PRICES FAIL TO RALLY FREIGHT MARKET - FIS
VLSFO bunker prices rebounded by $22.50 to $229/mt in the port of Singapore but failed to turn around the spot freight market.
Some ...
Saturday, 25 April 20
KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO. INVITED BIDS FOR 780K - 900K MT OF 5600 NCV COAL FOR JULY TO OCTOBER 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 780,000~900,000 Metric Tons (MT) s ...
Saturday, 25 April 20
SEAFARER MENTAL WELLBEING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC - STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
COVID-19 has forced many parts of the world to enforce a lockdown in a bid to flatten the curve in terms of transmissions ...
Friday, 24 April 20
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR 5700 NAR COAL FOR JUNE & JULY LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd. (KOMIPO) Has Issued An International Tender For 260,000 Metric Tons (MT) Steam Coal ...
Friday, 24 April 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
|
|
|
Showing 1001 to 1005 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|